Recent Posts

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 10

Desktops / Re: New Desktop Launchers

« Last post by lami07 on May 26, 2020, 06:01:30 pm »

Quote

There is no option for: PCmanFM-qt -> Edit -> Preferences -> Launch executable files without prompt

Of course there is such option. I know because I checked. I installed sparky potolo with lxqt inside virtual machine. This option exists and works ( partially ). Enabling it stops annoying question but does not hide red exclamation mark.

Applications / Re: Radiostation

« Last post by penguin on May 26, 2020, 11:22:10 am »

Quote from: pavroo on May 25, 2020, 10:22:01 pm

Post your radio station links and names so will add them to the next release.

Thanks pavroo. I personalized good enough the bookmarks file. It i very simple.
The only link that I did not arrived to play in ubuntu distros is :

Code [Select]

http://lin1.san.fast-serv.com:9844/; (i do not why).Maybe,I should dig a little deeper in your Radiostation code to understand why the above link played correctly in Firefox and not in Opera.

Applications / Re: Radiostation

« Last post by pavroo on May 25, 2020, 10:22:01 pm »

Post your radio station links and names so will add them to the next release.

Newbie questions / Re: Dropbox has now disappeared

« Last post by pavroo on May 25, 2020, 10:12:34 pm »

Re-debianized the dropbox package so it can be installed back on testing, so refresh package list and install it.

Newbie questions / Re: Dropbox has now disappeared

« Last post by ccshao on May 25, 2020, 08:09:27 pm »

It sounds a reasonable solution, but editing the deb file is new to me and I have to learn it first.

Desktops / Re: New Desktop Launchers

« Last post by KenUnix on May 24, 2020, 09:40:08 pm »

There is no option for: PCmanFM-qt -> Edit -> Preferences -> Launch executable files without prompt

The only option is: "don't ask questions on launch" which I already set.

Made no difference, I still get the red '!' in the middle of the icon.

Applications / Radiostation

« Last post by penguin on May 24, 2020, 01:03:12 pm »

Great pavroo. Tried and works good.Some small glitches (very rare) with memory. I personalized list, editing /~/.config/radiostation/bookmarks.xml.
The only link that Radiostation is not able to play was

Code [Select]

http://lin1.san.fast-serv.com:9844/; (Andy 80' Rare) .The link can be played by Firefox but not by Opera(the same engine as Chrome). Alternatively I tried to run

Code [Select]

https://radiovolna.net/en/6228-andys-80s.html in Radiostation, but gives the follow error Your GStreamer installation is missing a plug-in. Which pluig-in is missing ? I did not found solution. But searching internet :

Code [Select]

https://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=2220674

Code [Select]

http://www.webupd8.org/2014/04/10-things-to-do-after-installing-ubuntu.html

but gstreamer-FFmpeg is installed by gstreamer1.0-libav package (I need to test in Sparky Linux because this mom I am running lubuntu of my friend). I will come back latter if I can run it in Sparky.

Confirmed that :

Code [Select]

http://lin1.san.fast-serv.com:9844/; (Andy 80' Rare)

plays correctly in my Sparky Linux XFCE stable. Great sound.

Again. Thank you. pavroo.

Some ideas (for the moment).
1- A small editor that can edit easily bookmarks.xml would be great (separate from main program, aiming to leave it simple)

Desktops / Re: New Desktop Launchers

« Last post by lami07 on May 24, 2020, 11:26:41 am »

PCmanFM-qt -> Edit -> Preferences -> Launch executable files without prompt and Reboot.

Desktops / Re: New Desktop Launchers

« Last post by KenUnix on May 24, 2020, 03:32:59 am »

SparkyLinux 6 (Po-Tolo) LXQT.
uname -a 5.6.0-1-amd64 #1 SMP Debian 5.6.7-1 (2020-04-29) x86_64 GNU/Linux

I have Preferences set to "don't ask questions on launch" in File Manager. I have not had this
problem with other Distro's. Can someone help? Every time I make a launcher I have to right
click on the ICON and set "Trust this executable". Gets annoying because I have to test different
launchers with different applications.

Thanks

Applications / Re: can't upgrade Firefox from 68.0.2 to 72.0.2-1

« Last post by vp_nbi on May 23, 2020, 10:53:39 pm »

Quote from: paxmark1 on May 23, 2020, 04:06:22 pm

There has been a glitch - bug in the forum software for awhile, websites get marked up as code. For future reference, using the output of "inxi -r" and marking up as code stops - negates the code breakup example

Code: [Select]
paxmark@sway:~$ inxi -r Repos: Active apt repos in: /etc/apt/sources.list 1: deb http://mirror.steadfast.net/debian/ unstable main contrib non-free 2: deb-src http://mirror.steadfast.net/debian/ unstable main contrib non-freeNote: this is on straight sid on the 10 y.o. atom. My sparky lxqt is the on other half of the dual boot
My output of what Pavroo asked you to do is (in Sid).

Code: [Select]
sudo apt install firefox [sudo] password for paxmark: Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done Suggested packages: fonts-stix | otf-stix fonts-lmodern pulseaudio The following NEW packages will be installed: firefox 0 upgraded, 1 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded. Need to get 55.1 MB of archives. After this operation, 210 MB of additional disk space will be used. Get:1 http://mirror.steadfast.net/debian unstable/main i386 firefox i386 76.0.1-2 [55.1 MB] Fetched 55.1 MB in 25s (2,237 kB/s) Retrieving bug reports... Done Parsing Found/Fixed information... Done grave bugs of firefox (→ 76.0.1-2) <Outstanding> b1 - #888423 - firefox: FF 58.0 segfaults each 1-2 minute b2 - #909286 - firefox: "The bookmarks and history system will not be functional" message always b3 - #931334 - firefox: leaks sensitive information between private windows serious bugs of firefox (→ 76.0.1-2) <Outstanding> b4 - #871947 - [firefox] Firefox 55 regression for vCenter WebClient 6.0 b5 - #915582 - Installs non-free binaries from cisco and google again Summary: firefox(5 bugs) Are you sure you want to install/upgrade the above packages? [Y/n/?/...] sudo apt install firefox
Note: the graves and serious bugs do not appear to be that life threatening. Reading on bug 931334 is a good example - the reply to the first poster states why it is not as grave as stated.

Your mileage may vary (YMMV) as my example is in a straight Debian environment. It would not hurt for you to post what pavroo asked. "sudo apt install firefox" f

No - fiddling around with Firefox is irrelevant if the foundation has a flaw. libc6 affects everything, not just Firefox. Once the correct standard libraries are in place then it makes sense to look at Firefox in more detail.

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 10