Hi all. Downloaded the Xfce amd64 8.1 version. Sha256sum does not match. Gpg verification reports "bad signature". Hopefully just a mixup. Needless to say but I won't be installing.
I was around when Mintlinux iso images were hacked some years ago so nice to see developers signing iso images. Many do not.
Quote from: mmah on December 26, 2025, 12:40:43 AM[....] Downloaded the Xfce amd64 8.1 version. Sha256sum does not match.
(https://i.imgur.com/IqZHXhe.gif) Well, it seems that what you say is
completely FALSE.
As you can see in the attached images:
(https://i.imgur.com/o5prFCZ.png)
(https://i.imgur.com/ey9taqA.png)
Since not only the
sha256sum is totally correct. They are also
md5sum,
sha1sum and of course
sha512sum.
So, stop spouting nonsense and deceiving other users with
FUD &
hoaxes. (https://i.imgur.com/4GCd6.gif)
Cheers !! (https://i.imgur.com/uZvkZOF.gif)
Quote from: mmah on December 26, 2025, 12:40:43 AM[....] Downloaded the Xfce amd64 8.1 version. Sha256sum does not match.
By the way, the first images were from
'sourceforge.net' (Mirror 1).
And this one is from
'archive.org' (Mirror 2):
(https://i.imgur.com/Xu00i0S.png)
And, absolutely all checksums are also all correct.
(https://i.imgur.com/BXCIu.gif)
Quote from: mmah on December 26, 2025, 12:40:43 AM[....] Downloaded the Xfce amd64 8.1 version. Sha256sum does not match.
Notified the administrator with your lies and FUD .... (https://i.imgur.com/M548w.gif)
Settle down big fellow. Sorry if I pissed in your cornflakes. I've downloaded the iso image,checksums, and signature again. Yes, sha256sum and signature match.
I'm assuming they were fixed in the last few hours. https://sourceforge.net/p/sparkylinux/activity/?page=0&limit=100#694eafad8cc2817262c63797
Thanks for the warm welcome.
Quote from: mmah on December 26, 2025, 06:38:58 PM[....] I'm assuming they were fixed in the last few hours.
They haven't fixed anything, because
NOTHING was incorrect, tolai. (https://i.imgur.com/Lu1NYbU.gif)
The
isos are exactly the same as the ones, I checked this morning (at 02:16:24 AM and 02:38:14 AM).
As you can see in the links in these two images:
(https://i.imgur.com/akkzbv9.png)(https://i.imgur.com/axVgGYy.png) Where
all the checksums were absolutely correct.
FOPM (https://i.imgur.com/BXCIu.gif)